Contrasting views regarding creative services procurement
The need for Procurement services is a divisive issue. Many agencies
complain that it is a stick that the brands owners use to beat them down
on price, as it takes no account of the value that an agency brings to
the relationship between the purchaser and the supplier.
Contrast the latest views of Paul McIntyre,
who is editor-at-large at AdNews Australia with the opposing opinions
of commentators in the procurement business. Paul contends that Agencies
get caught up in a ‘race to the bottom’; -
‘Agencies
are their own worst enemies but the myopic nature of corporate
procurement means quality has to take a hit. For media agencies, their
way out is to start passing on the pain to media owners with all manner
of inventive schemes to bolster their own bottom line – some bordering
on dubious. Alongside innovative media and production arrangements,
younger people with less experience are taking bigger roles, resulting
in more client frustration’.
However Steve Puttock,
MD of Schawk in London suggests it’s time to unbundled creative spend
from production, arguing that media should be managed by specialist
media houses with global reach.
‘First, with media fragmentation
and the subsequent re-allocation of advertising budgets across new
media channels, the agency is a less obvious choice for production as
campaigns now need to be deployed consistently at consumer touch points
that go beyond advertising’s remit. Second, the increasing geographical
reach of brands can lead to brand inconsistencies across different
regions. By bringing production into a pre-media house that mirrors
their global footprint, brands can save money while also maximising
brand impact and uniformity.’
Is it time for a reality check? Should ‘agencies should grow up quick’ (as suggested by Ralph Daniel of Third i Marketing).
‘The uncomfortable truth for agencies
is that the chief marketing officer is in on this development. The
squeeze in fees that the advertising industry is experiencing is as a
result of better communication between marketing and procurement, not
worse. The end result, as far as the CMO is concerned, is that their
marketing dollar goes further – without a drop in quality.’
Whatever
the competitive situation faced by most creative services it is
unlikely that the pressure on delivering value for money services will
diminish. The key is how well the business is equipped to capitalise on
its margins and recover costs from existing and new prospective clients.
Where the agency portfolio includes a proportion of retained
clients that ‘demand satisfaction’ there will be capacity available from
others that have a less prescriptive outlook. The agency needs to look
for ways to identify these hidden gems.
Please share your views at editorial@paprika-software.com if you are interested.
